DIGIFORMINDEX

What AI automation is worth to your EBITDA.

SECTIONS01 / 05
01Overview→02Calculator→03Method→04Sources→05Questions→
HomeAICommerceGovernanceBack officeROIInsightsWork
BOOK A CALL →

24H REPLY · FROM A PRINCIPAL

WE BUILD IT AND WE RUN IT
0101 / 05
ROI calculator

What AI automation is worth to your EBITDA

Enter three numbers, get a range and a payback period. Every benchmark behind it is published further down.

Last updated 6 September 2026Where every number comes from →
0202 / 05
Every number is tagged
A — published researchB — our assumptionC — our rate card
Step 1 of 3Your volumes
$9.84 average, $2.65 best-in-class · Ardent Partners 2025
15–20% resolved without a person, at $3.50 avoided per call
Used for one sanity-check line. Never part of the calculation.
Step 2 of 3Narrow the range

Narrow the range

0 of 4 answered

Your range starts wide because we are guessing at these. Each answer tightens it.

01How do suppliers send invoices?
Mostly structured — EDI or e-invoiceA mixMostly PDF or paper
02Are calls mostly the same few questions?
Yes, largely repeatSome repeatNo, varied
03Have you automated any of this already?
No, all manualPartlyLargely automated
04Does anyone track how long invoice approval takes?
Yes, measuredRoughlyNo
Clear
Step 3 of 3Your result

Result locked. Enter your details to see the numbers.

Preview · unlocks when you submit
Expected cost reduction
$•••,••• — $•••,•••
per year
Range widthWidest — nothing answered
ConservativeDashed edge — before your answersOptimistic
Invoice processing$•••,••• — $•••,•••Call handling$•••,••• — $•••,•••Payback••• — ••• months
Both figures are cost you stop paying, so both reach EBITDA. Each benchmark is already net of what it costs to run the automation.
Unlock your numbers

Your range is ready above. Three fields and it unlocks, then stays visible while you change your inputs. We send a copy to your inbox.

We send a copy of the result and nothing else unless you ask.

Every benchmark and source below stays free.

0303 / 05
Method

How it is calculated

Invoice processing. Annual invoice volume, times the gap between the average cost per invoice and the best-in-class cost, times the share automation can handle in your industry.

Call handling. Annual call volume, times the share resolved without a person, times the cost avoided on each of those calls.

Payback. The pilot fee divided by the monthly saving. The fast end uses the optimistic figure, the slow end the conservative one.

0404 / 05
Reference

Where every number comes from

A — published research
Cost per invoice, all-in average$9.84Ardent Partners, State of ePayables2025
Cost per invoice, best-in-class (top 20%)$2.65Ardent Partners, State of ePayables2025
Average cost of an inbound call$7.20ContactBabel, US Decision-Makers' Guide2026
Issues fully resolved in self-service14%Gartner, survey of 5,728 customers2024
B — our assumptions
Avoided cost per contained call$3.50Under half the loaded cost of a staff-handled call. Containment removes the handling time, not the whole cost of running a contact function.
Calls resolved without a person10–30%Measured across every call that arrives, bounded by Gartner's 14% full self-service resolution and ContactBabel's 18% of chats handled without a person. Vendor figures of 50 to 90% cover a filtered set of simple calls.
Invoices automation can handle40–74%Depends how many suppliers send structured documents. Paper-heavy industries sit at the bottom.

A pilot from $15,000 is the figure payback is measured against — one workflow, about eight weeks. Scope moves it, so a larger or more entangled process costs more. Payback is never shown as shorter than the build, because nothing saves money before it runs.

0505 / 05
FAQ

Questions

How accurate is this?

Enough to decide whether to look further. Three numbers and published benchmarks give you a range.

Why a range and not one number?

Three self-reported figures cannot support a single answer. The width shows how much rests on the benchmarks.

What do the four extra questions change?

Each one replaces a guess, so the range gets narrower. Answers can narrow it downward as well as upward.

What does “resolved without a person” mean?

The call finishes without staff involvement. Our figure covers every call that arrives, including difficult ones.

My result is low. Is it broken?

No. Below a few hundred invoices a month the pilot fee often takes more than a year to earn back.

Which industries does this cover?

Manufacturing, insurance, healthcare, distribution and logistics, professional services. Industry changes two of the benchmarks.

Do I have to give my email?

Only for the result. Every benchmark, source and method note on this page stays free.

Can I use my own figures?

Yes. Bring your measured cost per invoice to the call and we will run the model against it.

01 / 05Overview02 / 05Calculator03 / 05Method04 / 05Sources05 / 05QuestionsIndex
On this pageClose ✕
01Overview02Calculator03Method04Sources05Questions
HomeCommerce & DigitalAI TransformationAI governance advisoryBack-office automationAI ROI CalculatorInsightsCPG case studyNOYZ case studyNOYZ · Only HumanNili Lotan case study
SITE INDEX — 12 PAGES · 86 SECTIONSCLOSE ✕
AOperating partnerHome01Commerce & Digital02AI Transformation03Why us04The work05Clients06Start
BPractice 01Commerce & Digital01Overview02Clients03What we do04Proof05Engagements06Questions07Storefront Review08Contact
CPractice 02AI Transformation01Overview02The gap03Clients04Problem & fix05The standard06Proof07Engagements08Questions09AI Value Map10Contact11Request an AI Value Map
DServiceAI governance advisory01Overview02In plain terms03The problem04What you get05How it runs06Why us07How you buy it08Questions09Start here10Regulated industries
EServiceBack-office automation01Overview02What we automate03Cost of waiting04Before & after05Clients06Case07How we deploy08Get an estimate09After you send10Honest answers11Methodology12Operator-led
FTool · you are hereAI ROI Calculator01Overview02Calculator03Method04Sources05Questions
GThe Digiform ReviewInsights01Feature Nº 1402In this issue03Topics & newsletter
HEssayInsight detail01The essay02The reading03Read next
IWorkCPG case study01Overview02Spec sheet03The problem04What we built05The stack06When it fails07The result08What it is worth09Get in touch
JWorkNOYZ case study01Overview02Spec sheet03The challenge04What we built05Build vs buy06What happened next07The speed work08Get in touch
KWorkNOYZ · Only Human01Overview02Spec sheet03What we built04Keep reading
LWorkNili Lotan case study01Overview02The store03Spec sheet04The brief05How we worked06What we shipped07Get in touch
Ask ClAIr

I answer from what’s published on this site — nothing else. If I don’t know, I’ll say so.

An AI assistant, not a person. It can be wrong.