DIGIFORMINDEX

AI governance for regulated industries.

SECTIONS01 / 08
01Overview→02In plain terms→03Where we stop→04What you get→05Who it’s for→06Why us→07Questions→08Get in touch→
HomeAICommerceGovernanceBack officeROIInsightsWork
BOOK A CALL →

24H REPLY · FROM A PRINCIPAL

INSPECTION-READY FROM DAY ONE
01
AI governance · Regulated industries

When the regulator asks, the answer has to be in writing.

AI governance for companies that answer to an inspector, an auditor or a supervisor. The board, the policy and the register — built so the decision trail holds up.

NIST AI RMFISO/IEC 42001EU AI Act
0202 / 08
In plain terms

What changes when you are regulated.

The governance itself does not change much. You still need a group of people who decide what AI gets used, a policy staff will read, and a register of every system you run.

What changes is the standard of evidence. In most companies the register answers a customer’s procurement questionnaire. In yours it has to stand up to someone with the authority to stop you trading.

That means dated decisions, named approvers, and a change history that explains why a model was updated and who signed it off. The work is the same. The record-keeping is not.

Most companiesRegulated
Who reads itA customer’s procurement formAn inspector, auditor or supervisor
What it provesThat governance existsThat each decision was made, when, and by whom
What it keepsThe current stateThe full change history
0303 / 08
Where we stop

We do AI governance. We do not do computer system validation.

We buildThe AI governance layer
  • The board
  • The policy
  • The register
  • Framework mapping
The boundary
Your quality function ownsValidation and inspection
  • Computer system validation
  • SOPs
  • Inspection readiness

We do AI governance. We do not do computer system validation, and we are not your quality function.

If you run a GxP environment you already have people who own validation, SOPs and inspection readiness. We build the AI governance layer so it sits alongside that, agrees with it, and does not create a second version of the truth.

Firms that claim to do both usually do one of them badly.

0404 / 08
What you get

Four deliverables, written for an audit reader.

01The board

Who decides, how often they meet, what they can approve without escalating. Minuted, with decisions dated and attributed.

02The policy

Short enough to be read, specific enough to be enforced, and versioned so you can show what the rules were on any given date.

03The register

Every AI system you run, its owner, what it touches, and what could go wrong. The document an auditor will ask for first.

04Framework mapping

Which obligations apply, against the standards that come up in audit and procurement.

NIST AI RMF

The US AI Risk Management Framework. Voluntary, and the one enterprise buyers ask about.

ISO/IEC 42001

The international standard for running an AI management system. Certifiable, so customers increasingly ask for evidence.

EU AI Act

Law if you sell into the EU. The strictest rules moved to December 2027, and August 2028 for AI built into regulated products.

Sector overlay · to confirm

The regulation your clients answer to goes here.

0505 / 08
Who this is for

Worth talking to us if a regulator, auditor or large customer has started asking how you govern AI, and the honest answer is that nobody owns it yet.

Healthcare · to confirmFinancial services · to confirmLife sciences · to confirm
0606 / 08
Why us
Hashi Sivananthan

We chair these boards, and we build the systems underneath them. When a board asks whether something can be built, what it costs to run, or why the pilot behaved differently from the demo, the answer comes in the room.

Hashi S.Chairs the AI governance board at a Fortune 500 brandLinkedIn →
0707 / 08
Questions

Questions regulated buyers ask.

What is AI governance in a regulated business?

The same work as anywhere else: a board that decides which AI gets used, a policy staff will read, and a register of every system. What changes is the record. Decisions are dated, approvers are named, and every change has a reason someone signed off.

Do you do computer system validation?

No. Validation, SOPs and inspection readiness belong to your quality function. We build the governance layer that sits alongside it. If you need validation done, we will say so and stay out of the way of whoever does it.

How does this sit alongside our existing quality system?

It points to your quality system rather than copying it. Register entries reference your validation records, policy changes go through your document control, and board decisions use the approval routes you already have. The aim is one version of the truth.

Which frameworks do you work to?

NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and the EU AI Act, mapped against the obligations that actually apply to you. The rules your sector regulator sets sit on top of those.

What does an auditor actually ask for?

Usually the register first: what AI you run, who owns it and what it touches. Then evidence that decisions were made on purpose — minutes, dates, named approvers — and a change history that explains why a model was updated and who signed it off.

Do we need a board, or will a register and an owner do?

Often a register and a named owner is enough to start, and we will tell you so. A board earns its place when several teams are deploying AI and decisions need to be consistent and minuted. If you are not there yet, start smaller.

0808 / 08
Get in touch

Get in touch.

A call with a principal to find what’s worth building, and whether we’re a fit.

Book a callAI governance advisory →
01 / 08Overview02 / 08In plain terms03 / 08Where we stop04 / 08What you get05 / 08Who it’s for06 / 08Why us07 / 08Questions08 / 08Get in touchIndex
On this pageClose ✕
01Overview02In plain terms03Where we stop04What you get05Who it’s for06Why us07Questions08Get in touch
HomeCommerce & DigitalAI TransformationAI governance advisoryBack-office automationROI LabInsightsCPG case studyNOYZ case studyNOYZ · Only HumanNili Lotan case study
SITE INDEX — 12 PAGES · 86 SECTIONSCLOSE ✕
AOperating partnerHome01Commerce & Digital02AI Transformation03Why us04The work05Clients06Start
BPractice 01Commerce & Digital01Overview02Clients03What we do04Proof05Engagements06Questions07Storefront Review08Contact
CPractice 02AI Transformation01Overview02The gap03Clients04Problem & fix05The standard06Proof07Engagements08Questions09AI Value Map10Contact11Request an AI Value Map
DService · you are hereAI governance advisory01Overview02In plain terms03The problem04What you get05How it runs06Why us07How you buy it08Questions09Start here10Regulated industries
EServiceBack-office automation01Overview02What we automate03Cost of waiting04Before & after05Clients06Case07How we deploy08Get an estimate09After you send10Honest answers11Methodology12Operator-led
FToolROI Lab01Overview02The lab03Method04Sources05Questions
GThe Digiform ReviewInsights01Feature Nº 1402In this issue03Topics & newsletter
HEssayInsight detail01The essay02The reading03Read next
IWorkCPG case study01Overview02Spec sheet03The problem04What we built05The stack06When it fails07The result08What it is worth09Get in touch
JWorkNOYZ case study01Overview02Spec sheet03The challenge04What we built05Build vs buy06What happened next07The speed work08Get in touch
KWorkNOYZ · Only Human01Overview02Spec sheet03What we built04Keep reading
LWorkNili Lotan case study01Overview02The store03Spec sheet04The brief05How we worked06What we shipped07Get in touch
Ask ClAIr

I answer from what’s published on this site — nothing else. If I don’t know, I’ll say so.

An AI assistant, not a person. It can be wrong.